
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & 0.02       & -0.00      & 0.16^{**}  & 0.09       \\
                        & (0.07)     & (0.06)     & (0.08)     & (0.06)     \\
Wave 2                  & -0.02      & 0.03       & 0.12       & 0.11^{*}   \\
                        & (0.06)     & (0.06)     & (0.08)     & (0.06)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 2 & -0.17^{*}  & -0.16^{*}  & 0.02       & 0.03       \\
                        & (0.09)     & (0.08)     & (0.12)     & (0.09)     \\
(Intercept)             & 3.04^{***} & 3.72^{***} & 3.15^{***} & 3.31^{***} \\
                        & (0.04)     & (0.04)     & (0.05)     & (0.04)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.01       & 0.00       & 0.01       & 0.01       \\
N                       & 1720       & 1725       & 1718       & 1731       \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of losing eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves1 and 2. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 250.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
